what are some obstacles to controlling population size

Practice of controlling rate of growth

Human population planning is the do of intentionally controlling the growth rate of a human population. The exercise, traditionally referred to as population control, had historically been implemented mainly with the goal of increasing population growth, though from the 1950s to the 1980s, concerns about overpopulation and its furnishings on poverty, the surround and political stability led to efforts to reduce population growth rates in many countries. More recently, however, several countries such as China, Nihon,[one] [2] Republic of korea,[3] Russia,[4] Iran, Italy,[5] Spain, Finland,[6] Hungary[7] and Estonia[8] [ix] take begun efforts to heave nativity rates once once more, generally as a response to looming demographic crises.

While population planning can involve measures that amend people'southward lives by giving them greater command of their reproduction, a few programs, such every bit the Chinese authorities's "one-child policy and two-child policy", accept employed coercive measures.

Types [edit]

Three types of population planning policies pursued by governments can be identified:

  1. Increasing or decreasing the overall population growth rate.
  2. Increasing or decreasing the relative population growth of a subgroup of people, such every bit those of high or low intelligence or those with special abilities or disabilities. Policies that aim to boost relative growth rates are known equally positive eugenics; those that aim to reduce relative growth rates are known as negative eugenics.
  3. Attempts to ensure that all population groups of a certain blazon (e.thou. all social classes within a gild) take the same average charge per unit of population growth.

Methods [edit]

While a specific population planning exercise may be legal/mandated in one country, information technology may be illegal or restricted in another, indicative of the controversy surrounding this topic.

Reducing population growth [edit]

Population planning, intended to reduce a population or sub-population's growth rates, may promote or enforce 1 or more than of the post-obit practices, although there are other methods:

  • Contraception
  • Abstinence

    World infant mortality rates in 2012[ten]

  • Reducing infant mortality so that parents do non demand to have many children to ensure at to the lowest degree some survive to adulthood.[eleven]
  • Abortion
  • Adoption
  • Changing status of women causing departure from traditional sexual partition of labour.
  • Sterilization
  • One-kid and 2-child policies, and other policies restricting or discouraging births directly.
  • Family unit planning[12]
  • Migration from rural areas to urban areas:[xiii] having more than children is financially more than beneficial (for farming families) in rural areas than in urban areas.
  • Create minor family "role models"[12]
  • Changes to immigration policies
  • War (Wars that are washed on purpose tin cause casualties that lower the population)
  • Higher taxation of parents who have too many children
  • Emigration[ citation needed ].

The method(south) chosen can be strongly influenced by the religious and cultural beliefs of community members. The failure of other methods of population planning can atomic number 82 to the use of abortion or infanticide as solutions.[ citation needed ]

Increasing population growth [edit]

Population policies that are intended to increase a population or subpopulation growth rates may utilize practices such as:

  • Higher taxation of married couples who have no, or as well few, children
  • Politicians imploring the populace to take bigger families
  • Revenue enhancement breaks and subsidies for families with children
  • Loosening of clearing restrictions, and/or mass recruitment of foreign workers past the government

History [edit]

Ancient times through Middle Ages [edit]

A number of ancient writers have reflected on the event of population. At near 300 BC, the Indian political philosopher Chanakya (c. 350-283 BC) considered population a source of political, economic, and military strength. Though a given region can house likewise many or too few people, he considered the latter possibility to exist the greater evil. Chanakya favored the remarriage of widows (which at the time was forbidden in India), opposed taxes encouraging emigration, and believed in restricting asceticism to the anile.[14]

In aboriginal Greece, Plato (427-347 BC) and Aristotle (384-322 BC) discussed the best population size for Greek city-states such equally Sparta, and concluded that cities should be small enough for efficient assistants and directly citizen participation in public diplomacy, but at the same time needed to be big enough to defend themselves against hostile neighbors. In order to maintain a desired population size, the philosophers advised that procreation, and if necessary, immigration, should be encouraged if the population size was also small. Emigration to colonies would be encouraged should the population become as well large.[fifteen] Aristotle concluded that a large increase in population would bring, "sure poverty on the citizenry and poverty is the cause of sedition and evil." To halt rapid population increase, Aristotle advocated the use of abortion and the exposure of newborns (that is, infanticide).[xvi]

Confucius (551-478 BC) and other Chinese writers cautioned that, "excessive growth may reduce output per worker, repress levels of living for the masses and engender strife." Confucius as well observed that, "mortality increases when nutrient supply is insufficient; that premature marriage makes for high infantile mortality rates, that war checks population growth."[15]

Aboriginal Rome, specially in the fourth dimension of Augustus (63 BC-AD xiv), needed manpower to learn and administer the vast Roman Empire. A series of laws were instituted to encourage early marriage and frequent childbirth. Lex Julia (18 BC) and the Lex Papia Poppaea (AD 9) are two well-known examples of such laws, which among others, provided taxation breaks and preferential treatment when applying for public function for those that complied with the laws. Severe limitations were imposed on those who did not. For example, the surviving spouse of a childless couple could only inherit one-10th of the deceased fortune, while the rest was taken by the state. These laws encountered resistance from the population which led to the disregard of their provisions and to their eventual abolitionism.[14]

Tertullian, an early Christian writer (ca. AD 160-220), was ane of the first to describe dearth and war as factors that can prevent overpopulation.[14] He wrote: "The strongest witness is the vast population of the earth to which we are a burden and she scarcely tin provide for our needs; equally our demands grow greater, our complaints against Nature's inadequacy are heard by all. The scourges of pestilence, famine, wars, and earthquakes have come up to be regarded as a blessing to overcrowded nations since they serve to clip away the luxuriant growth of the human race."[17]

Ibn Khaldun, a North African polymath (1332–1406), considered population changes to exist connected to economic development, linking high birth rates and low death rates to times of economic upswing, and low birth rates and high expiry rates to economic downswing. Khaldoun concluded that loftier population density rather than high absolute population numbers were desirable to reach more than efficient partitioning of labour and cheap administration.[17]

During the Middle Ages in Christian Europe, population issues were rarely discussed in isolation. Attitudes were generally pro-natalist in line with the Biblical command, "Be ye fruitful and multiply."[17]

16th and 17th centuries [edit]

European cities grew more than rapidly than before, and throughout the 16th century and early 17th century discussions on the advantages and disadvantages of population growth were frequent.[18] Niccolò Machiavelli, an Italian Renaissance political philosopher, wrote, "When every province of the world so teems with inhabitants that they can neither subsist where they are nor remove themselves elsewhere... the world will purge itself in one or another of these 3 ways," list floods, plague and famine.[19] Martin Luther concluded, "God makes children. He is too going to feed them."[19]

Jean Bodin, a French jurist and political philosopher (1530–1596), argued that larger populations meant more production and more exports, increasing the wealth of a country.[19] Giovanni Botero, an Italian priest and diplomat (1540–1617), emphasized that, "the greatness of a urban center rests on the multitude of its inhabitants and their power," simply pointed out that a population cannot increase across its nutrient supply. If this limit was approached, late union, emigration, and the war would serve to restore the residuum.[nineteen]

Richard Hakluyt, an English writer (1527–1616), observed that, "Through our longe peace and seldom sickness... we are grown more populous than ever heretofore;... many thousands of idle persons are inside this realme, which, having no way to be sett on work, be either mutinous and seek alteration in the state, or at to the lowest degree very burdensome to the commonwealth." Hakluyt believed that this led to law-breaking and full jails and in A Soapbox on Western Planting (1584), Hakluyt advocated for the emigration of the surplus population.[18] With the onset of the Thirty Years' War (1618–48), characterized past widespread devastation and deaths brought on by hunger and illness in Europe, concerns about depopulation returned.[twenty]

Population planning motility [edit]

In the 20th century, population planning proponents have fatigued from the insights of Thomas Malthus, a British clergyman and economist who published An Essay on the Principle of Population in 1798. Malthus argued that, "Population, when unchecked, increases in a geometrical ratio. Subsistence only increases in an arithmetical ratio." He also outlined the idea of "positive checks" and "preventative checks." "Positive checks", such as diseases, wars, disasters, famines, and genocides are factors which Malthus believed could increase the death rate.[21] "Preventative checks" were factors which Malthus believed could affect the birth rate such as moral restraint, forbearance and birth control.[21] He predicted that "positive checks" on exponential population growth would ultimately save humanity from itself and he also believed that man misery was an "absolute necessary consequence".[22] Malthus went on to explain why he believed that this misery affected the poor in a disproportionate manner.

There is a constant effort towards an increase in population which tends to subject field the lower classes of club to distress and to prevent any great permanent amelioration of their condition…. The mode in which these effects are produced seems to be this. We will suppose the means of subsistence in any country just equal to the like shooting fish in a barrel support of its inhabitants. The constant effort towards population... increases the number of people before the ways of subsistence are increased. The food, therefore which before supplied seven 1000000 must now be divided among seven million and a half or eight million. The poor consequently must live much worse, and many of them are reduced to astringent distress.[23]

Finally, Malthus advocated for the education of the lower course nigh the use of "moral restraint" or voluntary abstinence, which he believed would slow the growth charge per unit.[24]

Paul R. Ehrlich, a US biologist and environmentalist, published The Population Bomb in 1968, advocating stringent population planning policies.[25] His central argument on population is as follows:

A cancer is an uncontrolled multiplication of cells; the population explosion is an uncontrolled multiplication of people. Treating only the symptoms of cancer may make the victim more comfortable at first, but eventually, he dies - oft horribly. A like fate awaits a globe with a population explosion if only the symptoms are treated. We must shift our efforts from the treatment of the symptoms to the cutting out of cancer. The functioning volition demand many evidently roughshod and heartless decisions. The hurting may be intense. But the disease is and so far advanced that only with radical surgery does the patient have a take chances to survive.

[26]

Globe population 1950–2010

World population 1800-2000

In his concluding chapter, Ehrlich offered a partial solution to the "population problem", "[We need] compulsory birth regulation... [through] the addition of temporary sterilants to h2o supplies or staple food. Doses of the antidote would be advisedly rationed by the government to produce the desired family size".[26]

Ehrlich's views came to be accepted past many population planning advocates in the Usa and Europe in the 1960s and 1970s.[27] Since Ehrlich introduced his idea of the "population flop", overpopulation has been blamed for a variety of issues, including increasing poverty, loftier unemployment rates, environmental degradation, famine and genocide.[22] In a 2004 interview, Ehrlich reviewed the predictions in his book and constitute that while the specific dates within his predictions may have been wrong, his predictions about climatic change and affliction were valid. Ehrlich continued to abet for population planning and co-authored the book The Population Explosion, released in 1990 with his wife Anne Ehrlich.

Notwithstanding, it is controversial every bit to whether man population stabilization will avert environmental risks. A 2014 written report published in the Proceedings of the National University of Sciences of the Usa of America found that given the "inexorable demographic momentum of the global human population", even mass mortality events and draconian 1-child policies implemented on a global scale would notwithstanding likely effect in a population of 5 to ten billion by 2100. Therefore, while reduced fertility rates are positive for society and the surround, the curt term focus should be on mitigating the human being touch on on the environment through technological and social innovations, along with reducing overconsumption, with population planning being a long-term goal.[28] [29] A letter of the alphabet in response, published in the aforementioned periodical, argued that a reduction in population by 1 billion people in 2100 could help reduce the rick of catastrophic climate disruption.[xxx] A 2021 article published in Sustainability Science said that sensible population policies could accelerate social justice (such equally by abolishing child union, expanding family planning services and reforms that meliorate education for women and girls) and avoid the abusive and coercive population control schemes of the past while at the same time mitigating the human touch on on the climate, biodiversity and ecosystems past slowing fertility rates.[31]

Paige Whaley Eager argues that the shift in perception that occurred in the 1960s must be understood in the context of the demographic changes that took identify at the time.[32] Information technology was merely in the beginning decade of the 19th century that the world's population reached one billion. The second billion was added in the 1930s, and the next billion in the 1960s. ninety percent of this net increment occurred in developing countries.[32] Eager also argues that, at the time, the U.s.a. recognised that these demographic changes could significantly impact global geopolitics. Large increases occurred in China, Mexico and Nigeria, and demographers warned of a "population explosion", especially in developing countries from the mid-1950s onwards.[33]

In the 1980s, tension grew between population planning advocates and women'south wellness activists who advanced women'due south reproductive rights as part of a human rights-based approach.[34] Growing opposition to the narrow population planning focus led to a significant change in population planning policies in the early 1990s.[ further explanation needed ] [35]

Population planning and economics [edit]

Opinions vary among economists about the effects of population change on a nation's economic health. The states scientific research in 2009 concluded that the raising of a child toll nigh $16,000 yearly ($291,570 total for raising the child to its 18th birthday).[36] In the US, the multiplication of this number with the yearly population growth will yield the overall price of the population growth. Costs for other adult countries are usually of a similar club of magnitude.

Some economists, such as Thomas Sowell[37] and Walter East. Williams,[38] have argued that poverty and dearth are acquired past bad government and bad economical policies, not by overpopulation.

In his book The Ultimate Resource, economist Julian Simon argued that higher population density leads to more specialization and technological innovation, which in turn leads to a higher standard of living. He claimed that human beings are the ultimate resources since we possess "productive and inventive minds that aid observe creative solutions to man's issues, thus leaving us better off over the long run".[39]

Simon also claimed that when considering a list of countries ranked in order past population density, in that location is no correlation betwixt population density and poverty and starvation.[ commendation needed ] Instead, if a list of countries is considered according to corruption inside their respective governments, in that location is a pregnant correlation between authorities corruption, poverty and famine.[ citation needed ]

Views on population planning [edit]

Birth rate reductions [edit]

Back up [edit]

As early on every bit 1798, Thomas Malthus argued in his Essay on the Principle of Population for implementation of population planning. Around the year 1900, Sir Francis Galton said in his publication Hereditary Improvement: "The unfit could become enemies to the State if they keep to propagate." In 1968, Paul Ehrlich noted in The Population Flop, "We must cut the cancer of population growth", and "if this was not done, there would be only one other solution, namely the 'death rate solution' in which we raise the death rate through state of war-dearth-pestilence, etc."

In the aforementioned year, another prominent modern advocate for mandatory population planning was Garrett Hardin, who proposed in his landmark 1968 essay Tragedy of the commons, society must relinquish the "freedom to breed" through "mutual coercion, mutually agreed upon." After on, in 1972, he reaffirmed his support in his new essay "Exploring New Ethics for Survival", by stating, "We are breeding ourselves into oblivion." Many prominent personalities, such every bit Bertrand Russell, Margaret Sanger (1939), John D. Rockefeller, Frederick Osborn (1952), Isaac Asimov, Arne Næss[xl] and Jacques Cousteau accept also advocated for population planning. Today, a number of influential people advocate population planning such as these:

  • David Attenborough[41]
  • Jonathon Porritt, Great britain sustainable development commissioner[42]
  • Sara Parkin[43]
  • Crispin Tickell[44]
  • Christian de Duve, Nobel laureate[45]

The caput of the UN Millennium Project Jeffrey Sachs is also a strong proponent of decreasing the effects of overpopulation. In 2007, Jeffrey Sachs gave a number of lectures (2007 Reith Lectures) about population planning and overpopulation. In his lectures, called "Bursting at the Seams", he featured an integrated approach that would deal with a number of problems associated with overpopulation and poverty reduction. For case, when criticized for advocating mosquito nets he argued that child survival was, "past far one of the virtually powerful ways", to attain fertility reduction, as this would assure poor families that the smaller number of children they had would survive.[46]

Opposition [edit]

The Roman Catholic Church has opposed ballgame, sterilization, and artificial contraception as a general practice but especially in regard to population planning policies.[47] Pope Benedict XVI has stated, "The extermination of millions of unborn children, in the proper name of the fight confronting poverty, actually constitutes the destruction of the poorest of all human beings."[48] The reformed Theology pastor Dr. Stephen Tong likewise opposes the planning of man population.[49]

Many Muslim Majority countries criminalize abortion under the premise that information technology is "against the word of god".

Pro-natalist policies [edit]

In 1946, Poland introduced a tax on childlessness, discontinued in the 1970s, as part of natalist policies in the Communist government. From 1941 to the 1990s, the Soviet Wedlock had a similar tax to replenish the population losses incurred during the Second World State of war.

The Socialist Republic of Romania under Nicolae Ceaușescu severely repressed ballgame, (the virtually common nascency command method at the time) in 1966,[l] [51] and forced gynecological revisions and penalties for unmarried women and childless couples. The surge of the birth rate taxed the public services received past the decreţei 770 ("Scions of the Decree 770") generation. A consequence of Ceaușescu's natalist policy is that large numbers of children ended upward living in orphanages, considering their parents could not cope. The vast majority of children who lived in the communist orphanages were not actually orphans, but were merely children whose parents could not afford to enhance them.[52] The Romanian Revolution of 1989 preceded a autumn in population growth.

Balanced nascence policies [edit]

Nativity in the Western globe dropped during the interwar period. Swedish sociologists Alva and Gunnar Myrdal published Crisis in the Population Question in 1934, suggesting an extensive welfare state with universal healthcare and childcare, to increase overall Swedish nativity rates, and level the number of children at a reproductive level for all social classes in Sweden. Swedish fertility rose throughout World War Two (every bit Sweden was largely unharmed by the war) and peaked in 1946.

Modern exercise by country [edit]

Commonwealth of australia [edit]

Australia currently offers fortnightly Family Tax Benefit payments plus a costless immunization scheme, and recently proposed to pay all child care costs for women who desire to piece of work.[ citation needed ]

China [edit]

I-child era (1979–2015) [edit]

The most significant population planning system in the world was China'south one-kid policy, in which, with various exceptions, having more than than one child was discouraged. Unauthorized births were punished by fines, although there were also allegations of illegal forced abortions and forced sterilization.[53] As part of Prc's planned birth policy, (work) unit supervisors monitored the fertility of married women and may decide whose turn it is to have a baby.[54]

The Chinese regime introduced the policy in 1978 to alleviate the social and environmental bug of China.[55] According to government officials, the policy has helped forestall 400 million births. The success of the policy has been questioned, and reduction in fertility has too been attributed to the modernization of China.[56] The policy is controversial both within and outside of China because of its manner of implementation and because of concerns about negative economical and social consequences e.yard. female infanticide. In Asian cultures, the oldest male person child has responsibility of caring for the parents in their old age. Therefore, information technology is common for Asian families to invest nearly heavily in the oldest male child, such as providing college, steering them into the virtually lucrative careers, and then on. To these families, having an oldest male child is paramount, and then in a ane-child policy, daughters have no economic benefit, so daughters, peculiarly as a offset child, are often targeted for abortion or infanticide. Communist china introduced several authorities reforms to increase retirement payments to coincide with the one-child policy. During that time, couples could asking permission to have more than one child.[57]

China's population distribution in 2012, 2015 and 2020

According to Tibetologist Melvyn Goldstein, natalist feelings run high in China's Tibet Democratic Region, among both ordinary people and government officials. Seeing population control "as a matter of power and indigenous survival" rather than in terms of ecological sustainability, Tibetans successfully argued for an exemption of Tibetan people from the usual family planning policies in China such as the one-child policy.[58]

Two-kid era (2016-2021) [edit]

In November 2014, the Chinese authorities immune its people to conceive a second child nether the supervision of authorities regulation.[59]

On October 29, 2015, the ruling Chinese Communist Political party announced that all one-child policies would be scrapped, allowing all couples to have two children. The alter was needed to permit a amend residuum of male and female children, and to grow the young population to ease the problem of paying for the aging population. The law enacting the two-kid policy took consequence on January 1, 2016, and replaced the previous ane-child policy.[60] [61]

Three-child era (2021-) [edit]

In May 2021, the Chinese government allowed its people to conceive a third child, in a movement accompanied by "supportive measures" information technology regarded "conducive" to improving its "population structure, fulfilling the country's strategy of actively coping with an ageing population and maintaining the reward, endowment of human resource" after declining nascency rates recorded in the 2020 Chinese census.[62]

Hungary [edit]

During the 2nd Orbán Authorities, Hungary increased its family benefits spending from 1 of the lowest rates in the OECD to 1 of the highest.[63] In 2015, it amounted to well-nigh iv% of Gross domestic product.[64]

India [edit]

Only those with two or fewer children are eligible for election to a local authorities.[65]

Us two, our two ("Hum exercise, hamare do" in Hindi) is a slogan meaning one family unit, two children and is intended to reinforce the message of family planning thereby aiding population planning.

Facilities offered past government to its employees are limited to 2 children. The government offers incentives for families accepted for sterilization. Moreover, India was the first country to accept measures for family planning dorsum in 1952.[66]

In the due south west of India lies the long narrow coastal state of Kerala. Nearly of its xxx-2 million inhabitants live off the land and the ocean, a rich tropical ecosystem watered by two monsoons a yr. It's also ane of Bharat's almost crowded states – but the population is stable considering nigh everybody has small families… At the root of information technology all is education. Thanks to a long tradition of compulsory schooling for boys and girls Kerala has one of the highest literacy rates in the World. Where women are well educated they tend to cull to have smaller families… What Kerala shows is that y'all don't need aggressive policies or government incentives for birthrates to autumn. Everywhere in the earth where women have access to teaching and have the freedom to run their ain lives, on the whole they and their partners have been choosing to have smaller families than their parents. Just reducing birthrates is very hard to achieve without a elementary piece of medical technology, contraception.

BBC Horizon (2009), How Many People Can Live on Planet Earth

Iran [edit]

After the Iran–Republic of iraq War, Islamic republic of iran encouraged married couples to produce as many children as possible to supersede population lost to the war.[67]

Iran succeeded in sharply reducing its nascence rate from the late 1980s to 2010.[68] [ citation needed ] Mandatory contraceptive courses are required for both males and females before a wedlock license can be obtained, and the government emphasized the benefits of smaller families and the use of contraception.[69] This changed in 2012, when a major policy shift back towards increasing birth rates was appear. In 2014, permanent contraception and advertising of birth control were to exist outlawed.[70]

Israel [edit]

In Israel, Haredi families with many children receive economic back up through generous governmental child allowances, authorities assistance in housing young religious couples, too as specific funds by their ain community institutions.[71] Haredi women have an average of 6.7 children while the boilerplate Jewish Israeli woman has iii children.[72]

Japan [edit]

Nihon has experienced a shrinking population for many years.[73] The government is trying to encourage women to take children or to take more children – many Japanese women practice not have children, or even remain single. The population is culturally opposed to clearing.

Some Japanese localities, facing meaning population loss, are offer economical incentives. Yamatsuri, a town of 7,000 just north of Tokyo, offers parents $4,600 for the nascence of a child and $460 a year for 10 years.

Myanmar [edit]

In Myanmar, the Population planning Wellness Care Pecker requires some parents to infinite each child 3 years autonomously.[74] The measure is expected[ by whom? ] to be used confronting the persecuted Muslim Rohingyas minority.[75]

Pakistan [edit]

Russia [edit]

Russian President Vladimir Putin directed Parliament in 2006 to prefer a x-year program to finish the abrupt pass up in Russia'due south population, principally by offering financial incentives and subsidies to encourage women to have children.[76]

Singapore [edit]

Singapore has undergone two major phases in its population planning: commencement to slow and reverse the baby blast in the Mail service-World War II era; so from the 1980s onwards to encourage couples to accept more than children as the birth charge per unit had fallen below the replacement-level fertility. In addition, during the acting menstruum, eugenics policies were adopted.[77]

The anti-natalist policies flourished in the 1960s and 1970s: initiatives advocating small families were launched and adult into the Stop at Two programme, pushing for two-children families and promoting sterilisation. In 1984, the authorities announced the Graduate Mothers' Scheme, which favoured children of more well-educated mothers;[78] the policy was all the same presently abandoned due to the outcry in the general election of the same year.[79] Eventually, the government became pro-natalist in the late 1980s, marked by its Have Three or More program in 1987.[fourscore] Singapore pays $3,000 for the start child, $ix,000 in greenbacks and savings for the second; and up to $xviii,000 each for the tertiary and fourth.[76]

Spain [edit]

In 2017, the government of Espana appointed Edelmira Barreira, as "minister for sex", in a pro-natalist attempt to reverse a negative population growth rate.[81]

Turkey [edit]

In May 2012, Turkey's Prime number Government minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan argued that abortion is murder and announced that legislative preparations to severely limit the exercise are underway. Erdogan also argued that abortion and C-section deliveries are plots to stall Turkey'southward economic growth. Prior to this motility, Erdogan had repeatedly demanded that each couple have at least 3 children.[82]

United States [edit]

Enacted in 1970, Title X of the Public Health Service Human action provides admission to contraceptive services, supplies and data to those in need. Priority for services is given to people with low incomes. The Title X Family Planning program is administered through the Office of Population Affairs nether the Office of Public Health and Science. It is directed by the Office of Family unit Planning.[83] In 2007, Congress appropriated roughly $283 meg for family planning under Title 10, at to the lowest degree 90 percent of which was used for services in family unit planning clinics.[83] Championship X is a vital source of funding for family planning clinics throughout the nation,[84] which provide reproductive health care, including abortion.

The teaching and services supplied by the Title Ten-funded clinics support young individuals and low-income families. The goals of developing healthy families are accomplished past helping individuals and couples determine whether to take children and when the appropriate time to do so would be.[84]

Title X has made the prevention of unintended pregnancies possible.[84] It has allowed millions of American women to receive necessary reproductive health care, plan their pregnancies and prevent abortions. Title X is dedicated exclusively to funding family planning and reproductive health intendance services.[83]

Title X as a percentage of total public funding to family planning client services has steadily declined from 44% of total expenditures in 1980 to 12% in 2006. Medicaid has increased from 20% to 71% in the aforementioned time. In 2006, Medicaid contributed $1.3 billion to public family planning.[85]

In the early 1970s, the Usa Congress established the Commission on Population Growth and the American Time to come (Chairman John D. Rockefeller III), which was created to provide recommendations regarding population growth and its social consequences. The Commission submitted its terminal recommendations in 1972, which included promoting contraceptives and liberalizing abortion regulations, for case.[86]

Natalism in the The states [edit]

In a 2004 editorial in The New York Times, David Brooks expressed the opinion that the relatively loftier nascency rate of the U.s.a. in comparison to Europe could exist attributed to social groups with "natalist" attitudes.[87] The commodity is referred to in an analysis of the Quiverfull movement.[88] However, the figures identified for the demographic are extremely depression.

Former U.s.a. Senator Rick Santorum made natalism part of his platform for his 2012 presidential campaign.[89] Many of those categorized in the General Social Survey every bit "Fundamentalist Protestant" are more or less natalist, and have a higher nascence rate than "Moderate" and "Liberal" Protestants.[xc] However, Rick Santorum is not a Protestant only a practicing Catholic.

Uzbekistan [edit]

It is reported that Uzbekistan has been pursuing a policy of forced sterilizations, hysterectomies and IUD insertions since the late 1990s in order to impose population planning.[91] [92] [93] [94] [95] [96] [97]

See too [edit]

  • Population ethics
  • Antinatalism
  • Birth command
  • Eugenics
  • Human overpopulation
  • Listing of population concern organizations
  • Malthus' Dismal Theorem
  • Overconsumption
  • Steady-state economy
  • Pledge 2 or fewer (campaign for small families)
  • Planet of the Humans
  • Voluntary Human Extinction Motility

Fiction [edit]

  • Logan's Run (Volume) - Country-mandated euthanasia at 21 for all people (30 in the film) to conserve resources.
  • Make Room! Brand Room! (Book) - Novel, explores the consequence of overpopulation.
  • Avengers: Infinity War (Flick) - Antagonist and villain Thanos kills half of all living things throughout universe in order to maintain ecological balance.
  • Inferno (Picture show) - A billionaire has created a virus that will kill 50% of the world's population to salve the other l%. His followers attempt to release the virus after his suicide.
  • Shadow Children (Book series) - Families are allowed ii children maximum, and "shadow children" (third children and beyond) are field of study to be killed.
  • 2 B R 0 2 B (Book) - Aging is cured and each new life requires the sacrifice of another in order to maintain a stable population.
  • 2BR02B: To Be or Nothing to Be (Movie) - Based on the above book.

References [edit]

  1. ^ "Fears grow that Japan's nativity rate and crumbling crisis could be worsened by pandemic". The Japan Times. 18 August 2020. Retrieved four August 2021.
  2. ^ "Japan to fund AI matchmaking to boost nascence rate". BBC News. 8 December 2020. Retrieved 4 August 2021.
  3. ^ Lee, David D. (27 December 2020). "Tin Republic of korea elevator the world's everyman nascence charge per unit by offering cash incentives?". South China Morning time Post . Retrieved 4 August 2021.
  4. ^ "How exercise countries fight falling nativity rates?". BBC News. 15 January 2020. Retrieved 4 Baronial 2021.
  5. ^ "How practice countries fight falling birth rates?". BBC News. 15 January 2020. Retrieved four Baronial 2021.
  6. ^ "Business entrance hall calls for govt action to boost Finland's nativity rate". Yle.fi . Retrieved iv August 2021.
  7. ^ "Hungary tries for baby boom with tax breaks and loan forgiveness". BBC . Retrieved 21 September 2021.
  8. ^ Rooney, Katharine. "This is how Estonia is growing its population". World Economic Forum . Retrieved 21 September 2021.
  9. ^ Männi, Marian. "Feature: Estonians starting to have more kids — because they tin". ERR Online . Retrieved 21 September 2021.
  10. ^ Infant Mortality Rates in 2012 Archived July xiv, 2014, at the Wayback Motorcar, UNICEF, 2013.
  11. ^ Lifeblood: How to Change the World Ane Dead Mosquito at a Time, Alex Perry p9
  12. ^ a b Ryerson, William N. (2010). "Ch.12: Population: The Multiplier of Everything Else". The Post Carbon Reader: Managing the 21st Century's Sustainability Crises. Healdsburg, Calif.: Watershed Media. pp. 153–174. ISBN978-0970950062.
  13. ^ Urbanization: An Environmental Forcefulness to Be Reckoned With
  14. ^ a b c Neurath, Paul (1994). From Malthus to the Club of Rome and Back. Grand.E. Sharpe. p. 7. ISBN9781563244070.
  15. ^ a b Neurath, Paul (1994). From Malthus to the Society of Rome and Back. Yard.E. Sharpe. p. 6. ISBN9781563244070.
  16. ^ Neurath, Paul (1994). From Malthus to the Society of Rome and Dorsum. M.Due east. Sharpe. pp. 6–7. ISBN9781563244070.
  17. ^ a b c Neurath, Paul (1994). From Malthus to the Club of Rome and Back. M.Due east. Sharpe. p. 8. ISBN9781563244070.
  18. ^ a b Neurath, Paul (1994). From Malthus to the Lodge of Rome and Dorsum. M.Due east. Sharpe. p. 10. ISBN9781563244070.
  19. ^ a b c d Neurath, Paul (1994). From Malthus to the Club of Rome and Dorsum. M.E. Sharpe. p. 9. ISBN9781563244070.
  20. ^ Neurath, Paul (1994). From Malthus to the Guild of Rome and Dorsum. 1000.E. Sharpe. pp. 10–eleven. ISBN9781563244070.
  21. ^ a b Rosenberg, M. (2007, September 09)3-two. Thomas Malthus on Population. Retrieved June 20, 2009, from About.com "Geography Spider web site" Archived 2009-06-24 at the Wayback Machine
  22. ^ a b Knudsen, Lara (2006). Reproductive Rights in a Global Context . Vanderbilt University Printing. pp. two–iii. ISBN9780826515285. reproductive rights.
  23. ^ Bleier, R. The Domicile Folio of the International Society of Malthus. Retrieved June 20, 2009, from The International Social club of Malthus Web site: "Malthus Society Rationale and Core Principles". Archived from the original on 2009-06-18. Retrieved 2009-06-26 .
  24. ^ Thomas Robert Malthus, 1766-1834 Archived 2009-08-01 at the Wayback Machine. Retrieved June 20, 2009, from The History of Economic Thought Website
  25. ^ Knudsen, Lara (2006). Reproductive Rights in a Global Context . Vanderbilt University Printing. pp. 3. ISBN9780826515285. reproductive rights.
  26. ^ a b Knudsen, Lara (2006). Reproductive Rights in a Global Context . Vanderbilt University Press. pp. iii. ISBN9780826515285. reproductive rights.
  27. ^ Knudsen, Lara (2006). Reproductive Rights in a Global Context . Vanderbilt University Press. pp. 3–4. ISBN9780826515285. reproductive rights.
  28. ^ McGrath, Matt (October 27, 2014). "Population controls 'will not solve environment issues'". BBC. Archived from the original on May iv, 2016. Retrieved May eight, 2016.
  29. ^ Bradshaw, Corey J. A.; Brook, Barry W. (2014). "Human population reduction is not a quick fix for environmental bug". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United states of America. 111 (46): 16610–16615. Bibcode:2014PNAS..11116610B. doi:10.1073/pnas.1410465111. PMC4246304. PMID 25349398.
  30. ^ Spears, Dean (2015). "Smaller man population in 2100 could importantly reduce the take a chance of climate catastrophe". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the U.s.. 112 (18): E2270. Bibcode:2015PNAS..112E2270S. doi:10.1073/pnas.1501763112. PMC4426416. PMID 25848063.
  31. ^ Wolf, C.; Ripple, W.J.; Crist, Eastward. (2021). "Human population, social justice, and climate policy" (PDF). Sustainability Science. 16 (5): 1753–1756. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00951-due west. S2CID 233404010.
  32. ^ a b Whaley Eager, Paige (2004). Global Population Policy. Ashgate Publishing. p. 36. ISBN9780754641629.
  33. ^ Whaley Eager, Paige (2004). Global Population Policy. Ashgate Publishing. p. 37. ISBN9780754641629.
  34. ^ Knudsen, Lara (2006). Reproductive Rights in a Global Context . Vanderbilt University Press. pp. ii. ISBN9780826515285. reproductive rights.
  35. ^ Knudsen, Lara (2006). Reproductive Rights in a Global Context . Vanderbilt University Press. pp. 4–v. ISBN9780826515285. reproductive rights.
  36. ^ Abbott, Charles (August four, 2009). "Pricetag to raise a child -- $291,570, says U.Southward". Reuters. Archived from the original on Baronial 24, 2010.
  37. ^ Thomas Sowell Julian Simon, combatant in a 200-yr war Archived 2009-07-08 at the Portuguese Web Archive Thomas Sowell, February 12, 1998
  38. ^ Population command nonsense Archived 2016-05-xv at the Wayback Machine Walter Williams, February 24, 1999
  39. ^ Moore, S. (1998, March/Apr). Julian Simon Remembered: it'south a Wonderful Life. Retrieved June 25, 2009, from CATO Constitute Web site Archived 2009-06-26 at the Wayback Automobile
  40. ^ Nicholas Goodrick-Clarke (1998). Hitler's Priestess: Savitri Devi, the Hindu-Aryan Myth, and Neo-Nazism. NY: New York University Press, ISBN 0-8147-3110-iv
  41. ^ Leake, Jonathan (August 3, 2003). "Attenborough cutting population past half". The Times. London. Archived from the original on May 8, 2009.
  42. ^ Schwarz, Walter (September 1, 2004). "Oversupply control". The Guardian. London. Archived from the original on November 16, 2016.
  43. ^ Local to Global: Kingston University Archived 2008-05-27 at the Wayback Machine
  44. ^ "Final Give-and-take Archive - New Scientist". newscientist.com. Archived from the original on xix October 2013. Retrieved nine May 2018.
  45. ^ Lloyd, Robin (30 June 2011) Laureate urges next generation to address population control as primal issue Archived 2012-04-ten at Wikiwix Scientific Americain, Retrieved 9 Apr 2012
  46. ^ BBC.co.uk Archived 2009-04-12 at the Wayback Car Bursting at the Seams
  47. ^ Saunders, William. "Church Has Always Condemned Abortion". Catholic News Agency. Arlington Catholic Herald. Archived from the original on 21 March 2017. Retrieved twenty March 2017.
  48. ^ "42nd Globe Day of Peace 2009, Fighting Poverty to Build Peace - Benedict XVI". www.vatican.va. Archived from the original on eleven October 2011. Retrieved ix May 2018.
  49. ^ "唐崇荣牧师 圣经难解经文 第二十九讲 诺亚咒诅迦南 - 宗教与信仰 - 旺旺网 给你一片纯净的天空". Archived from the original on 2017-03-23. Retrieved 2017-03-22 . 唐崇荣牧师 圣经难解经文 第二十九讲 诺亚咒诅迦南, Retrieved 22 Mar 2017.
  50. ^ Scarlat, Sandra (May 17, 2005), "'Decreţeii': produsele unei epoci care a îmbolnăvit România" [Scions of the Decree': Products of an Era that Sickened Romania], Evenimentul Zilei (in Romanian), archived from the original on September 26, 2007 .
  51. ^ Kligman, Gail (1998), The Politics of Duplicity. Controlling Reproduction in Ceausescu'southward Romania, Berkeley: Univ. of California Press, ISBN9780520919853 .
  52. ^ "BBC NEWS - Europe - What happened to Romania'due south orphans?". news.bbc.co.united kingdom of great britain and northern ireland. 2005-07-08. Retrieved 19 July 2017.
  53. ^ Arthur Eastward. Dewey, Assistant Secretarial assistant for Population, Refugees and Migration Testimony before the Firm International Relations Commission Washington, DC December 14, 2004 "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2011-07-21. Retrieved 2009-07-31 . {{cite spider web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy equally championship (link)
  54. ^ http://lcweb2.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/r?frd/cstdy:@field(DOCID+cn0081) Archived 2013-03-03 at the Wayback Machine
  55. ^ Pascal Rocha da Silva, "La politique de l'enfant unique en République Populaire de Chine", 2006, Université de Genève, pp. 22–28, cf. Sinoptic.ch Archived 2007-eleven-28 at the Wayback Car
  56. ^ "Has China's ane-child policy worked?". BBC News. September 20, 2007. Archived from the original on July nineteen, 2008.
  57. ^ Fisher, Max (November xvi, 2013). "Red china's rules for when families can and can't have more than one child". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on June 10, 2016. Retrieved May viii, 2016.
  58. ^ Goldstein, Melvyn; Cynthia, Beall (March 1991). "Communist china's Nascence Control Policy in the Tibet Autonomous Region". Asian Survey. 31 (iii): 285–303. doi:10.1525/as.1991.31.3.00p0043x.
  59. ^ "Why China'due south 2nd-Baby Smash Might Not Happen". Bloomberg. Archived from the original on 2016-03-06.
  60. ^ "Mainland china to terminate i-child policy and allow two". BBC. 29 October 2015.
  61. ^ "China officially ends one-child policy, signing into law bill allowing married couples to have two children". ABC Online. 27 December 2015.
  62. ^ "People's republic of china allows three children in major policy shift". BBC News. 2021-05-31. Retrieved 2021-09-06 .
  63. ^ Visegrad Insight - The V4'due south greatest existential threat - Demographic decline and an ageing population - Filip Mazurczak - August five, 2014
  64. ^ OECD - Public spending on family benefits
  65. ^ Buch, Nirmala (2005). "Police force of Two-Child Norm in Panchayats: Implications, Consequences and Experiences". Economic and Political Weekly. 40 (24): 2421–2429. ISSN 0012-9976. JSTOR 4416748.
  66. ^ Aalok Ranjan Chaurasia, Ravendra Singh. "twoscore YEARS OF PLANNED Family PLANNING EFFORTS IN Bharat" (PDF). p. 1. Retrieved 26 June 2019.
  67. ^ Beaugé, Florence (2 February 2016). "'Get dorsum to your washing auto': Islamic republic of iran'south aggressive women". Le monde diplomatique. Archived from the original on 8 Apr 2016. Retrieved 27 April 2016.
  68. ^ Abbasi-Shavasi, Mohammad J.; McDonald, Pater (February 2005). "National and Provincial-level fertility trends in Iran, 1972-2000" (PDF). Working Newspaper in Census (94): nine–10. Retrieved 20 February 2019.
  69. ^ Iran's Birth Rate Plummeting at Record Pace Archived 2008-09-17 at the Wayback Automobile
  70. ^ "Iran bans permanent contraception in attempt to increase population". independent.co.uk. 11 August 2014. Archived from the original on 29 August 2017. Retrieved nine May 2018.
  71. ^ Friedlander, Dov (2002). "Fertility in Israel: Is the Transition to Replacement Level in Sight?" (PDF). Completing the Fertility Transition. United Nations, Section of Economic and Social Affairs Population Division. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2017-12-11.
  72. ^ Morland, Paul (April 7, 2014). "Israeli women do information technology past the numbers". The Jewish Chronicle. Archived from the original on 21 May 2014. Retrieved 20 May 2014.
  73. ^ "Japan's demography: the incredible shrinking land". The Economist. 25 March 2014. Archived from the original on 24 March 2017. Retrieved 25 March 2017.
  74. ^ "Myanmar president signs off on contested population police force". 23 May 2015 – via Associated Press.
  75. ^ "Rohingyas: Still in peril: Myanmar's repression of Rohingyas continues apace". The Economist. Singapore. 6 June 2015. Archived from the original on 7 June 2015. Retrieved 7 June 2015. This measure grants local authorities the power to mandate that mothers in areas deemed to have high rates of population growth accept children no fewer than three years autonomously. Buddhist chauvinists in Myanmar have fomented fears of high birth rates amid Muslims; this measure is likely to be used against Rohingyas.
  76. ^ a b Chivers, C.J (May 11, 2006). "Putin Urges Programme to Contrary Slide in the Nascence Rate". The New York Times. Archived from the original on May 15, 2017.
  77. ^ Wong, Theresa; Yeoh, Brenda S.A (June 2003), Fertility and the Family: An Overview of Pro-natalist Population Policies in Singapore (PDF), Asian MetaCentre Research Paper Series, archived from the original (PDF) on 2011-07-27, retrieved 2013-xi-30
  78. ^ Louhiala, Pekka (2004). Preventing intellectual disability: ethical and clinical issues. Cambridge Academy Printing. p. 62. ISBN978-0-521-53371-3.
  79. ^ Quah, Jon (1985). "Singapore in 1984: Leadership Transition in an Election Twelvemonth". Asian Survey. 25 (two): 220–231. doi:x.1525/as.1985.25.2.01p0247v. JSTOR 2644306.
  80. ^ "Singapore: Population Control Policies". Land Studies. Library of Congress. 1989. Archived from the original on 11 April 2011. Retrieved 11 August 2011.
  81. ^ "Spain appoints 'sexual activity tsar' in bid to boost declining population". The Independent. 25 Feb 2017. Archived from the original on 26 March 2017. Retrieved 25 March 2017.
  82. ^ "The states, Turkey: abortion". Reuters (article). 2012-06-03. Archived from the original on 2015-01-02.
  83. ^ a b c Office of Population Affairs Archived 2007-10-19 at the Wayback Machine
  84. ^ a b c "Newsroom and Media Kit - Planned Parenthood". www.plannedparenthood.org. Archived from the original on 8 December 2007. Retrieved 9 May 2018.
  85. ^ Sonfield, Adam; Alrich, Casey; Gold, Rachel Benson (2008). "Public Funding for Family Planning, Sterilization and Abortion Services, FY 1980–2006" (PDF). Occasional Report. New York: Guttmacher Institute. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2017-09-10.
  86. ^ Population and the American time to come; the report. United States. HathiTrust Digital Library. Washington. 1972. hdl:2027/mdp.39015007261855.
  87. ^ Brooks, David (2004-12-07), "The New Ruby-red-Diaper Babies", The New York Times, archived from the original on 2007-03-11, retrieved 21 Jan 2006 .
  88. ^ Joyce, Kathryn (27 November 2006), "Arrows for the State of war", The Nation, archived from the original on xx March 2015, retrieved 10 March 2015 .
  89. ^ Kim, Seung Min (fifteen January 2012). "Santorum: More babies, delight!". Politico. Archived from the original on 18 January 2012.
  90. ^ McKeown, John (14 June 2010). "Receptions of Israelite Nation-edifice: Modernistic Protestant Natalism and Martin Luther". Dialog. 49 (two): 133–140. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6385.2010.00517.x. hdl:10034/254540.
  91. ^ Birth Control by Prescript in Uzbekistan Archived 2013-10-19 at the Wayback Machine IWPR Plant for War & Peace Reporting, published 2005-eleven-18, accessed 2012-04-12
  92. ^ BBC News: Uzbekistan'south policy of secretly sterilising women Archived 2015-04-05 at the Wayback Machine BBC, published 2012-04-12, accessed 2012-04-12
  93. ^ Crossing Continents: Forced Sterilisation in Uzbekistan Archived 2016-09-03 at the Wayback Machine BBC, published 2012-04-12, accessed 2012-04-12
  94. ^ Uzbeks Face Forced Sterilization Archived 2013-10-19 at the Wayback Car The Moscow Times published 2010-03-10, accessed 2012-04-12
  95. ^ Shadow Report: UN Committee Against Torture Archived 2014-11-09 at the Wayback Auto United nations, authors Rapid Response Group and OMCT, published November 2007, accessed 2012-04-12
  96. ^ Antelava, Natalia (12 April 2012). "Uzbekistan's policy of secretly sterilising women". BBC World Service. Archived from the original on 2 March 2015.
  97. ^ Antelava, Natalia (12 April 2012). "Uzbekistan's policy of secretly sterilising women". BBC World Service. Archived from the original on 5 April 2015.

Further reading [edit]

  • "Controlled nutrient supply Could cease overpopulation". Carrie Gazarish. Daily Kent Stater, Volume 32, Number 52, Kent Country University.
  • Warren C. Robinson; John A. Ross (2007). The global family planning revolution: three decades of population policies and programs. World Depository financial institution Publications. ISBN978-0-8213-6951-7.
  • Thomlinson, R. 1975. Demographic Problems: Controversy over Population Control. 2nd ed. Encino, CA: Dickenson.
  • David Pimentel. The Case for Population Reduction: Miscellaneous papers of David Pimentel. Collection of papers, reprints, and other publications on population command and related bug. Cornell Academy.
  • "From population control to reproductive rights: feminist fault lines" (PDF). Rosalind Pollack Petchesky. Reproductive Health Matters Book three, Issue vi, November 1995. Taylor & Francis.

External links [edit]

External video
video icon Could We Command Human OVER Population? BBC Globe Lab
  • "A conversation with Tim Flannery, senior inquiry scientist, on Population Control". Karina Kelly, Peter Kirkwood, Owen Craig. Archived from the original on 2010-01-13.

elderroung1976.blogspot.com

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_population_planning

0 Response to "what are some obstacles to controlling population size"

Post a Comment

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel